Prophet Uebert Angel wants court to dismiss Bentley case wants the court to throw out Mr Shava’s claim on the grounds that he was never the owner of the Bentley. “The Respondent (Mr Shava) was never the owner of the motor vehicle. “The motor vehicle was owned by one Anderson Tagara, whose name appears on the registration book . . .,” said Prophet Angel. “Further, the motor vehicle was purchased from Anderson Tagara by Benjamin Mudzanire — the Applicant’s (Prophet Angel) brother and there is an agreement of sale to that effect . . .,” he added. An agreement of sale attached to the application confirms the transaction. In an affidavit supporting the transaction, Mr Tagara said that he was the first purchaser and importer of the vehicle and confirms selling it to Mr Mudzanire. He said he was later informed that the same vehicle was later sold to Mr Phibeon Busangabanye in May last year. Prophet Angel said in the court papers that Mr Shava has no title to the vehicle and therefore cannot claim its return to him. “Resultantly, the Respondent (Mr Shava) cannot sue for the return of a motor vehicle that he never owned and which was purchased in accordance with the law churches , Crime , prophets , Religion , uebert angel
